Monday, April 5, 2010

General says Air Force lesbian won't be kicked out.

In a bizarre twist, an Air Force general is refusing to discharge a female officer who revealed that she is in a civil union with another woman because he alleges she is using Don't Ask, Don't Tell to avoid military service. I can't help but be reminded of Cpl. Klinger, played by Jamie Farr, in the 70's sitcom M*A*S*H, who wore women's clothes in order to get kicked out of the army. Everyone knew it was a dodge and refused to kick him out, but he kept at it.

But that was when we had a draft in this country. It was not unheard of for people to make up such stories to avoid military service back then. Those individuals were usually subjected to a battery of psychological tests for days on end to prove they were lying. For the last 35 years, we've had an all volunteer military and to my knowledge, no such testing has been required of anyone who has been discharged under DADT in the 17 years since it became law.

The Los Angeles Times reported on Friday that Lt. Robin R. Caurasiya revealed to her commanding officer, General Robert R. Allardice, that she is a lesbian, but the general claims that she's only doing it to get out of the service.

The Times reports:
At the very least, said Nathaniel Frank, an expert on "don't ask, don't tell," the Chaurasiya case appears to turn the rationale behind the gay ban on its head.

"If commanders are ignoring or rejecting credible evidence of homosexuality because of the alleged motive of the person who makes the statement, the bottom line is they are keeping gay people in the service," said Frank, a senior research fellow at UC Santa Barbara's Palm Center. "That gives the lie that known gay people undercut the military."
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

"Rock For Equlity" Takes on Social Security Inequality with Alien Lesbian (video)

This is just one more reason why marriage rights matter. One of the more than 1,100 federal rights and responsibilities that come with a marriage certificate is the right to receive Social Security survivor benefits when your spouse dies. This monthly check could mean the difference between having enough to eat and a place to live and being homeless and hungry in your golden years.

Visit Rock For Equality for more information about the plight of LGBT seniors. With any luck we'll all live to a ripe old age, but with the way things are, the future looks bleak for LGBT Americans who have paid into the Social Security systems all of our lives. Will those benefits be there when we need them? Not unless we take action.
 
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Anna Paquin Comes Out as Bi in Ad Campaign for Cyndi Lauper's GiveADamn.org (video)

Several gay, lesbian, bisexual and straight celebrities have lent their faces and voices to a new video ad campaign for the launch of pop diva Cyndi Lauper's new web-based project, GiveADamn.org.The organization is project of Lauper's True Colors Fund and is dedicated to increasing awareness of LGBT issues.

The video ad includes a lot of familiar celebrity faces, including Elton John, Clay Aiken, Wanda Sykes and Cynthia Nixon, but the newest celeb to come out is Oscar winner and "True Blood" star Anna Paquin, who tells us in the video that she is bi-sexual. Straight allies appearing in the ad include Eric Roberts, Judith Light, Kim Kardashian and Sharon and Kelly Osborn.

According to the Give A Damn site, the project is designed for anybody who gives a damn about LGBT equality, but is especially  aimed at our straight allies. The interactive site contains space to share stories and videos, a page devoted to keeping up with all the issues and a blog. I know I'll be checking it out frequently. I hope you will too.

Reports are that when news hit of Anna Paquin's coming out announcement in the video, there were so many visitors to the site that it crashed. Here's the video that's been causing such an uproar.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Saturday, April 3, 2010

My Take on the Catholic Church's Pedophile Priest Scandal

The Catholic church once again finds itself embroiled in a major international scandal involving allegations of sexual misconduct with minors. After the wave of accusations and multimillion dollar lawsuits against the church that happened in the 90's nobody is surprised by this latest wave of allegations that have swept across Europe and have once again surfaced here in the US.

What is surprising this time is that the allegations include accusations of a cover up within the church that go all the way to the top. The Pope himself is being accused of failing to take action over a decade ago in several cases involving priests from Arizona to Germany when then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, known as "The Enforcer" was tasked with handling such cases.

As the pontiff prepares to celebrate Easter mass tomorrow at St. Peter's Square, his popularity among Catholics has reached an all-time low, with a favorable rating of just 27%, down from 40% in 2006, according to a CBS News poll.

The pope's personal pastor recently made a statement during a sermon comparing the latest allegations to the Nazi persecution of the Jews during the Holocaust. Having been raised Catholic, I can tell you that this is a classic Catholic response. Any time you get called to account for your misdeeds, turn the tables and play the martyr. It's a routine my mother perfected very early in life. Jewish mothers have nothing on Catholic mothers when it comes to that sort of thing.

Although this story has been unfolding over the last couple of weeks, I haven't written about it before for a couple of reasons. First of all, there are stories to be told that have a more direct impact on the LGBT community and due to the limited amount of time I have during the day to update the blog, I've chosen to focus on those.

Second, but perhaps most importantly, this story hits a little close to home for me. Finding the right words to tell the story of my encounter with my now-deceased pedophile priest uncle when I was 13, has been difficult and has caused some confusion and hard feelings within my own family. What makes this story especially difficult to tell is not because of what happened, but because of what didn't, but could have happened, during the summer of 1973 when I spent two weeks at my grandmother's house in rural Sudbury Massachusetts.

That was the year that my parents had finally decided to file for divorce after 3 or 4 years of half-hearted attempts to work things out. Dad had moved out, tensions were very high at home. I was the fourth of six kids, just starting puberty and was having a really hard time dealing with it all. In other words, I was a perfect target for a pedophile priest.

My parents decided that putting me on a bus by myself to make the six-hour trip from Maryland to Massachusetts to spend some time at my grandmother's house with my uncle, Father Jim, was just the solution to my problem child status. Father Jim told me when I arrived that my parents had asked him explain the birds and the bees to me, despite the fact that I had taken a sex education class at school the year before. (I later confirmed with both my parents that this was true.) Father Jim must have felt like a kid in a candy store. Not only did he have a 13-year old kid to share his bedroom with, he had the blessing of the parents. When he started talking about things like nocturnal emissions, erections, the evils of masturbation and when he would undress in front of me, he could say it was for educational purposes.

My grandmother lived in a old farmhouse that had a tub with no shower, so every morning, I had to take a full bath. The first day, Father Jim came in to "wash my back". That first time, that was all he did or attempted to do. Having been totally creeped out by the experience, the next day I locked the bathroom door. Father Jim informed me that the house rule was that the bathroom door would never be locked, because if my frail grandmother fell in the tub, someone wouldn't be able to get to her. Never mind that my grandmother and I never bathed together, it was a house rule and I was expected to follow it.

After that, I took the quickest bath I could possibly take, so that by the time Father Jim came in to "wash my back", I'd be finished. It was then that things got even creepier. He came in as I was toweling off, so I wrapped the towel around myself. He told me that I shouldn't feel ashamed of my body and to open the towel. He took a good hard look before I covered up and left the room to quickly get dressed.

There's something that non-Catholics don't understand about the relationship that Catholics have with their priests. These guys are in a position of ultimate authority. They have a direct line to the man upstairs, they are entrusted with your deepest, darkest secrets in the confessional and they can grant absolution for any sin you might commit. They are invited into the homes of parishioners for Sunday dinner. They baptize children, and throughout their lives grant them the sacraments of communion, confession, confirmation, marriage and last rites. From cradle to grave, the parish priest is there as a trusted member of the family.

In a traditional Catholic family, the sensitive son who doesn't like girls or sports feels a great deal of pressure to become a priest. Is it any wonder there are so many gays in the priesthood? I felt it that pressure. But the time I spent with my uncle put an end to any thoughts of a career in the church. In fact, that was the year I started pulling away from the church altogether.

There were other instances of Father Jim taking liberties, but I won't go into them. Suffice it to say that the time I spent with him became a game of cat and mouse. While technically, "nothing happened", it wasn't for a lack of trying on his part. Back then there was no conversation about the threat of child sexual abuse. In the decades since, parents and counselors tell kids to pay attention to that inner feeling that tells them something is wrong with the situation they're in, to get away from it and tell an adult. As a 13-year-old, I did just that, except that I didn't tell anyone, I just tried to put it behind me.

It was about ten years before I finally told my mother about what I went through that summer. Her response was one of discomfort and anger at discussing the subject. As a devout Catholic, she had always idolized my uncle. She had stayed in close contact with him even after the divorce. She told me that if I really was so upset about it, I should confront him myself. She showed no sense of outrage toward him or any sense of guilt for having put me in that situation in the first place. It's not that I blame her, but any parent would feel a sense of guilt over their role in handing their kid over to a pedophile. There should have been some sense of a betrayal of trust, but there wasn't. There was only her anger at me for wanting to discuss such a distasteful subject.

As for confronting my uncle, how do you accuse somebody of something that didn't happen? He didn't actually molest me. He wanted to. He tried to, but he didn't, because I didn't let it happen. This is the crux of the matter.

When I told my father several years later about what his brother had tried to do, he was appropriately outraged. The next time he saw Father Jim, he confronted him about it and became violent. My uncle, naturally, denied  everything. When my father told me about the incident, I felt both proud and awful at the same time. My father had not been a part of my life since my parents' divorce, but his reaction was what I had wanted from my mother years before, but had been denied.

On the other hand, there was the fact that no actual sexual contact had taken place. Father Jim could truthfully deny that anything had taken place. I tried to set the record straight with my father a few times over the years, but I found that the more I tried, the more confusing it became. The bottom line for me is that I love my father for standing up for me.

Father Jim died several years ago. I don't know what he may of may not have done to other kids over the years. I only know that he was never publicly accused or prosecuted. And I know that if the god he devoted his life in service to does exist, there is a special place in hell for people like him, where he is suffering eternal torment as we speak.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Friday, April 2, 2010

Army Sec. McHugh clarifies: "No, seriously. Don't tell." Speak up for those who can't!

Secretary of the Army John McHugh says he misspoke earlier this week when he said that gay and lesbian soldiers would not be kicked out during the year-long study on the effects of Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal. Despite wanting to talk to queer service members during the course of the study, McHugh says he didn't mean to infer that a stop-loss would be in place. So that whole "feel free to ask and tell" thing isn't part of the deal.

Advocate.com reports that McHugh released a statement on Thursday saying, "Until Congress repeals 'don't ask, don't tell,' it remains the law of the land and the Department of the Army and I will fulfill our obligation to uphold it," McHugh said in a statement Thursday. "There is no moratorium of the law and neither (Gates) nor I would support one."

So the year-long study will not include any input from the people most affected by DADT and its repeal, if it ever happens. Is it just me, or does anyone else see this as a major slap in the face? Its just one more way the administration says to the LGBT community, "Trust me, I know what I'm doing. Now shut up and sit down."

We will not shut up and sit down. We will not allow our voices to go unheard as this year-long stalling tactic takes place. We will not only ask, we will demand that our leaders stand up for our rights. We will tell our stories as clearly and loudly and as often as it takes until our rights are fully protected under the law.

I am putting out the call to all gay and lesbian military veterans in the Roanoke area to join me tomorrow, Saturday, April 3rd at 3pm at Mill Mountain Coffee & Tea, 112 Campbell Ave. (on the City Market) as we meet with Terry McGuire from the Human Rights Campaign to plan a lobbying session at the Roanoke office of Sen. Jim Webb, asking for support in the effort to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

Terry has been organizing these lobbying efforts throughout the commonwealth over the last several weeks. Webb's office has not yet responded to Terry's numerous attempts to make an appointment. He will be in the Roanoke area over the next few days to get the details nailed down.

Like a lot of bloggers, I've been critical of some of the statements coming from HRC president Joe Solmonese, but I also believe in giving credit where credit is due. This is a truly worthwhile effort. This is our chance to prove that Southwestern Virginia's LGBT community can and will stand up for our rights.

Speak out for those who can't without losing their jobs. Join us tomorrow to find out what you can do to change this unjust law that not only discriminates against our community, but seriously impairs our nation's ability to defend itself.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, April 1, 2010

GOP Sex Club Scandal: Gay for Pay is A-Okay! (video)

Is the party of "No!" becoming the party of "Maybe"? The Republican Party, who has spent the better part of the last four decades railing against same-sex sex may be moving closer to the middle than they'd like to admit, the middle of a very pricey lap dance. GOP chairman Michael Steele has some 'splainin' to do as  he finds himself in the middle of a sex scandal involving members of his staff requesting reimbursement for a $2000 tab at the bondage-themed West Hollywood sex club, Voyeur.

According to the Washington Post, the night was part of a lavish wining and dining gesture of gratitude for the RNC's Young Eagles program which targets donors under the age of 45.

So, in case you're keeping track, the Republicans are against homosexual acts between actual homosexuals, but they are so much in favor of two heterosexual women pretending to have lesbian sex on stage for the sexual gratification of straight men, that they'll happily pay for it.

This sounds like a winning strategy to me. We've been doing it all wrong. Forget marching, protesting, lobbying and chaining ourselves to the White House fence. If we really want to win over hearts and minds, we have to aim for the crotch. We have to pretend to be straight, then pretend to be gay while we pretend to have sex in front of them. Not only will we have a better chance at winning full equality, we'll have a wad of cash in our g-strings to show for it at the end of the night. It's a little like "Victor-Victoria", but with better tips. It's so simple, why didn't we think of it sooner?

Here's Jon Stewart's take on the developing scandal:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Army Sec. McHugh Won't Seek Discharges During DADT Study

Army Secretary John McHugh has said that while conducting the year-long study on the impact of the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT), he wants to talk to gay and lesbian service members to get their input. The problem is, doing so violates the policy. According to the NY Times, Sec. McHugh has said that he will ignore the policy in order to get queer soldiers to come forward.
Mr. McHugh, who spoke at a breakfast with Pentagon reporters, said it made no sense to pursue discharges of service members as he speaks with them about the change in policy. Mr. Obama, Mr. Gates and Admiral Mullen have all asked commanders to assess opinion within the military about the change in law.

Mr. McHugh said it would be “counterproductive” to “take disciplinary action against someone who spoke with me openly and honestly.” He said the Pentagon was still trying to devise a way to more formally poll large numbers of service members about their views on changing the law.

At the same breakfast, Mr. McHugh also said that a three-star general who was criticized by the Pentagon leadership last week for speaking out against repeal of the law would not receive a letter of reprimand. Instead, Mr. McHugh said the officer, Lt. Gen. Benjamin R. Mixon, had had numerous conversations with Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, and now recognized that his comments were “inappropriate.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]