Showing posts with label California Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California Constitution. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Group Sues to Force Arnie and Jerry to Defend Prop 8 in Court

30 May 2009, Fresno, California, USA. "Me...Image via WikipediaOne of the most interesting aspects of the ongoing legal saga of California's Prop 8 is that both Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown declined to defend the constitutional amendment in court claiming it violated the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

This factor is the key to whether or not this case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Prop 8 proponents, who defended the discriminatory initiative, are not government officials and as private citizens are not charged with upholding or enforcing the law and, therefore, may not have the legal standing to file an appeal to Judge Vaughn Walker's July ruling that overturned the voter initiative.

If there is no appeal, then same-sex marriage remains legal in California, but the ruling stays local. Some elements of the anti-equality side have admitted that it may be worth sacrificing California in order to protect opposite marriage in the remaining 45 states.

Now a conservative California legal group, The Pacific Justice Institute, is suing to force the Governator and second-generation Attorney General Brown to force them to defend Prop 8, on the basis that they have the sworn duty to uphold the law, regardless of their personal beliefs. If they succeed, which legal experts say is unlikely, the issue of standing will be a moot point and the case can proceed through the appeals process.

The Associated Press reports via the San Jose Mercury News:
The state has until Sept. 11 to challenge Walker's ruling in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Both Brown and Schwarzenegger, who also refused to support Proposition 8 in Walker's court, have said they do not plan to. The institute is arguing that as the state's chief law enforcement officer, Brown does not have discretion to defend only laws with which he personally agrees. And because the California Constitution gives the governor final say when he and the attorney general disagree on legal matters, Schwarzenegger must be compelled to file an appeal to preserve Proposition 8 as well, the group's lawsuit states.
"To allow an elected official to trump the will of the people by mere inaction and the lack of fulfillment of their duty to do their job would be an egregious violation of public trust," Pacific Legal Institute Brad Dacus said Tuesday. The institute brought its motion on behalf of Joshua Beckley, pastor of Ecclesia Christian Fellowship church in San Bernardino, and included with it a declaration of support from former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese III.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Key findings and full text of Judge Walker's Prop 8 ruling

A protest in Washington, D.C. against the pass...Image via Wikipedia
Ever since the closing arguments in Perry vs. Schwarzenegger took place two months ago, the LGBT community has been wondering why it was taking so long for Judge Walker to rule on the case. The short answer is that there was a lot of evidence and testimony to review, even though none of what the pro-8 side presented had any legal merit.

Having read through the e transcript of Judge Walker's opinion, I'm glad he took his time deliberating this case. It's going to be very difficult for his judgement to be overturned on appeal. That doesn't mean the haters won't try. The other side has already filed a motion to delay implementation of the ruling, which Judge Walker is currently considering.

The 138-page ruling has gone viral since it was released Wednesday. (See the full text below). Here are some of Judge Walker's key findings as posted in the Los Angeles Times:

  • "Plaintiffs have demonstrated by overwhelming evidence that Proposition 8 violates their due process and equal protection rights and that they will continue to suffer these constitutional violations until state officials cease enforcement of Proposition 8. California is able to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, as it has already issued 18,000 marriage licenses to same sex couples and has not suffered any demonstrated harm as a result ...
  • "Because Proposition 8 is unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, the court orders entry of judgment permanently ... prohibiting the official defendants [state of California] from applying or enforcing Proposition 8..."
  • "Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. Because California has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians, and because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional."
Prop 8 Ruling FINAL

Enhanced by Zemanta